Search for: "MATTER OF T J B" Results 721 - 740 of 3,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
Id. at 22 (Brook, J., dissenting). (1) Court of Appeals had appellate jurisdiction despite defective notices of appeal where court granted defendant’s petitions for writ of certiorari in its discretion and State did not object; (2) Sufficiency of evidence argument was not preserved and defendant’s argument did not warrant invocation of Rule 2 of the Appellate Rules of Procedure; (3) Where the defendant was not given an opportunity to be heard and no other evidence showed that… [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “Further delay in proposed ICO GDPR fine for Marriott”. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Those standards were as reasonably precise as the statute's subject matter permitted. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Didn’t matter how original symbols/words were or what other choices were possible at the time of creation. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:58 am by Corey McGehee
The post Sixth Circuit Practice Tip: You Can’t Renew a Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Never Made in the First Place. appeared first on Sixth Circuit Appellate Blog. [read post]
Had Congress deadlocked over which slate to count, it could have declared the Democratic candidate, Samuel Tilden, the winner, as he had more undisputed electoral votes than did the Republican Rutherford B. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:58 am by Robert Liles
NEW — Abusive ordering, certifying, referring, or prescribing of Part A or B services, items or drugs. 42 C.F.R. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:58 am by Robert Liles
NEW — Abusive ordering, certifying, referring, or prescribing of Part A or B services, items or drugs. 42 C.F.R. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm by Giles Peaker
That permission to appeal was refused by Zacaroli J on 23 January. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:28 pm by Patricia Hughes
In other words, the oath requirement does not completely deny the appellants’ right to express their views on the matter. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm by Phil Dixon
The matter was therefore vacated and remanded for further proceedings. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 10:59 am by Josh Blackman
Also, I have doubts that § 158(b)(4)(i)(B), as applied here, would be consistent with the original meaning of the First Amendment. [read post]