Search for: "Mark Williams v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 2,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am by NCC Staff
In 1978, Justice William Brennan wrote for a 6-3 majority in the Penn Central v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am by Andree Blumstein
Mark Janus is a child-support specialist employed by Illinois. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm by Afro-Buff
In this regard it is worth noting and adapting what was said in William Grant & Sons Ltd v Cape Wine & Distillers Ltd 1990 (3) SA 897 (C), being that “[t]he mere lapse of a number of years during which plaintiffs took no action does not in itself justify a finding of acquiescence on their part” (at 924A). [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  1902 marked first case, and also introduction of Brownie camera, opened up a new field. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:58 am by Yishai Schwartz
Following the events of Nov. 13 summarized in the last post in this series, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri reconvened on Tuesday, Nov. 14 to continue testimony and the “preadmission” of evidence relating to physical evidence from the site of the attack on the USS Cole, identified as Appellate Exhibit 207. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Two US academics, Eric Goldman and Jeff Kosseff, have put together an interesting collection of articles on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and, to mark the twentieth anniversary of the pivotal decision in Zeran v AOL – which they describe as “internet law’s most important decision“. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
On Monday, the Supreme Court granted cert. in Microsoft v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am by MBettman
On October 17, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case Mark Schwartz, Individually and as the Executor of the Estate of Kathleen Schwartz, et al. v. [read post]