Search for: "Matter of Hodge"
Results 721 - 740
of 823
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
The Court observed that over the past half century, various matters, including financial exigency, security issues, and perceived mission imperatives, had led to an increasing number of petitions seeking to dispose by sale of church treasures [*]. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am
The objector suggested an alternative position, which was agreed by the Parish; consequently, the Petition was effectively unopposed, and the D A C having considered the matter in detail, supported the proposals and recommend that the Faculty be granted as it was presently sought [6]. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
It’s quite possible that the Chief (and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, for that matter) would continue to uphold the Roe/Casey-based constitutional right to obtain a pre-viability abortion if someone has the resources and resolve to travel (even, where needed, to another state) to where such an abortion is available. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:30 am
Having considered the matters raised by the CBC, Historic England and the Victorian Society and having balanced them against the responses given by the Petitioners, Chancellor Gau was persuaded that any harm caused to the significance of the Church is justified by the public benefits that would result from it [13]. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
As an historical matter, many of the developments we discussed above after the arrival of new membership at the Court began to occur quite quickly. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
” As a general matter, the state observes, stare decisis is “at its weakest” when courts are interpreting the Constitution, because the democratically elected branches have no recourse (short of a constitutional amendment) to correct a court’s erroneous constitutional interpretation. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:26 am
Lord Reed and Lord Hodge adopted a formulation that the Creditor [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
” The chief saw the matter through a different lens: “No … you’re not seeking to join the institution, you’re seeking to change what the institution is. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
” Because the text and history are so plain, the challengers conclude, New York’s denial of their concealed-carry applications violated the Constitution, and the New York law cannot survive no matter which constitutional test the court applies. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
Hodges, 14-556 (Ohio), Tanco v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
In some ways the case reflects the problem posed by Parkes QC in Hodges v Naish. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
In particular, Lord Carnwath noted: it was only if the words used by the parties were “unambiguous” that the court had no choice in the matter of interpretation; The fact that a particular construction leads to a very unreasonable result was a relevant consideration. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:42 am
Hodge Ch. noted that until June 2021, the caselaw disclosed two competing approaches to applications for a faculty where there had been non-compliance with the relevant Churchyard Regulations: one required ‘exceptional’, ‘powerful’ or ‘substantial’ reasons for departing from the Regulations; the other simply asked whether the proposed memorial was ‘suitable’ [9]. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am
Rather, “[w]hat matters, at bottom, is what an employee does. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
Hodges, June 26, 2015, Kennedy, A.). [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
Karl Hodge also has a post which considered how, if services are provided online to users for free, they payment made is usually in the form of personal data provided to the service provider. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Hodges. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
Max Mosley has denied money to fund press regulator Impress was put together by his father and 1930s fascist leader Oswald Mosley, and said ‘Impress is completely independent – where the money is coming from doesn’t matter’. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Hodges 14-556Issue: (1) Whether Ohio’s constitutional and statutory bans on recognition of marriages of same-sex couples validly entered in other jurisdictions violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:51 am
Governor Gavin Newsom you’ve got my support no matter what you want to do from here on out. [read post]
