Search for: "ROBERT THOMAS" Results 721 - 740 of 10,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2023, 6:01 am by Above the Law
[NBC News] * Speaking of... comparing Clarence Thomas to the "lowliest" federal worker is a stark reminder that John Roberts is running a cesspool of ethical compromise. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:08 pm by Howard Bashman
“Most Federal Employees Face More Oversight Than Clarence Thomas and Supreme Court; Ethics rules at US agencies limit gifts, require disclosure; Chief Justice Roberts says high court standards are sufficient”: David Voreacos of Bloomberg News has this report. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:50 am by Ted Max and Joseph Ireland
 The opinion written by Justice Sotomayor, in which Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Jackson joined, held that the “purpose and character” of AWF’s commercial use of Warhol’s portraits of Prince shared the same commercial purpose of the original photograph taken by Ms. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:14 am by Seán Binder
Thomas Gibbons-Neff reports for the New York Times. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:12 pm by Ilya Somin
At the Inverse Condemnation blog, property law specialist Robert Thomas notes that the case is relevant to the increasingly influential "property theory" of the Fourth Amendment, which holds that violations occur when the government engages in surveillance or searches that violate established property rights. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:29 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Gorsuch, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett, found that the Pike balancing task propose by the petitioners is one no court is equipped to undertake. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 11:49 am by Ted Max and Joseph Ireland
 The opinion written by Justice Sotomayor, in which Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Jackson joined, held that the “purpose and character” of AWF’s commercial use of Warhol’s portraits of Prince shared the same commercial purpose of the original photograph taken by Ms. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 11:39 am by Ted Max and Joseph Ireland
 The opinion written by Justice Sotomayor, in which Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Jackson joined, held that the “purpose and character” of AWF’s commercial use of Warhol’s portraits of Prince shared the same commercial purpose of the original photograph taken by Ms. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times were sued over articles alleging Roberts-Smith killed unarmed prisoners. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:59 am by Sharon Block
Thomas, in a separate opinion joined by Gorsuch, urged the court to reconsider Garmon preemption in a future case. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 2:40 am by Seán Binder
Thomas Grove reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito both filed concurring opinions, which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm by Simon Lester
Instead, we got a majority opinion that includes separately stated views from Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, Barrett, Sotomayor, and Kagan, rejecting the claim for different reasons. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:10 pm by Steve Gottlieb
People ask me what I think about Clarence Thomas’ misbehavior. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:35 pm by Josh Blackman
California (2021), Justice Kagan wrote the majority opinion, Justice Kavanaugh wrote a concurrence, Justice Thomas wrote an opinion concurring in part and concurring in judgment, and Chief Justice Roberts wrote an opinion concurring in judgment. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:56 am by Ted Max and Joseph Ireland
The opinion written by Justice Sotomayor, in which Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Jackson joined, held that the “purpose and character” of AWF’s commercial use of Warhol’s portraits of Prince shared the same commercial purpose of the original photograph taken by Ms. [read post]
The majority decision in Sackett, authored by Justice Alito and joined by Justices Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Barrett, roundly rejected the “significant nexus” test as inconsistent with the text and structure of the Clean Water Act and instead announced a new rule: The Clean Water Act extends only to those “adjoining” wetlands that have a “continuous surface connection” to navigable waters and are, as a practical matter,… [read post]