Search for: "Research in Motion Limited"
Results 721 - 740
of 3,047
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 pm
Electronics had 2 patents out of the 47, Thomas Licensing S.A. held 4, Bharat Heavy Electrical Held 2, Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc., held 3, Research in Motion Limited held 3 and the others, such as, Samsung, AIIMS, Saint-Gobain, Fujiflims, Honeywell, Bayer, BP Chemicals Limite A British Company, The Secretary, Ministry Of Information, Technology, The Trustees Of Princeton University, PPG Industries Ohio,Inc. and Honda Motors held one patent each. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
DNA has a great reputation, especially if no one bothers to research its accuracy. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 7:07 am
Roundtable Location Name and Organization Key Messages Edmonton Linda Cameron, University of Alberta Press Opposed to expanding fair dealing, no broad education exemption, copyright collectives, protect TPMs Shane Kennedy, Lone Pine Productions Protect TPMs, no vague fair dealing Ernie Ingles, Vice Provost, University of… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
You have a limited time to file any legal action involving the BioJoint procedure. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:59 am
Computer programs operating on certain machines solely for the purpose of good-faith security research. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
For the reasons set out in Kruse’s motion and in this reply, the answer to both questions is no. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
Mann Foundation for Scientific Research's patents, including US 5 531 774 relating to a programmable cochlear stimulator. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
Baines, “Transparency at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC),” 361 Lancet 781 (2003). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
The Honduran Constitution limits the president to only one four-year term and makes the rule entrenching this term limit formally unamendable. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:09 pm
Repeated motions performed in the course of normal work or other daily activities can result in repetitive motion disorders such as bursitis and tendonitis. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) and the Respondents are Research In Motion, Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation (collectively, “RIM”), and Apple Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:07 am
I followed up with GPT-4, therefore, by asking “Now imagine that you have limited time to prepare this motion. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 4:48 am
These decisions indicated that the Court of Appeals holds discretion to grant or deny a petition for writ of certiorari that is not limited by Rule 21. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
" The course originally had a quite modest objective--to introduce law students to legal research and reasoning through case law, statutory interpretation, and legal history, processes, and institutions. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 1:57 pm
Defendants filed a summary judgment motion of inequitable conduct, which the district court denied. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) and the Respondents are Research In Motion, Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation (collectively, “RIM”), and Apple Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:59 pm
What detection limits should be used? [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:00 am
Before you file your motion, do your research on the Judge What is the judge’s reputation? [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:22 am
According to the motion to dismiss, the maximum price rules serve several salutary functions: (1) they protect the health and safety of egg donors and infertile patients by reducing their incentive to hide medical information, (2) they resolve "social welfare concerns" about the exploitation or undue inducement of egg donors, (3) they protect against the devaluation of human life, and (4) the price caps provide access to donated eggs for infertile couples with limited economic… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
Knowles $4,000.00 in damages.The trial court denied the Defendant’s post-trial motions seeking a new trial on the basis that the trial erred in denying the pre-trial Motion In Limine.On appeal, the Superior Court found that the trial court erred on the admissibility of evidence issue but felt that the error was harmless in light of the cautionary instructions given by the trial court judge and therefore allowed the verdict to stand.In footnote 3 of its Opinion, the… [read post]
