Search for: "Right v. USA" Results 721 - 740 of 4,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2010, 10:22 am by Steve Hall
Brady rights are named after the Supreme Court's Brady v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
” The rapper revealed he plans to sue for 8 to 10 million dollars, which  might seem extreme for some but falls within the average damages compensation for infringing a celebrity’s publicity right in the USA. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 2:50 pm by Matthew Guariglia
  TAKE ACTION TELL the mayor: we need protections against police surveillance Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An employee is constructively discharged when her or his employer, rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign" (Golston-Green v City of New York, 184 AD3d at 44; see Nelson v HSBC Bank USA, 41 AD3d 445, 447). [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:42 am by Erin Miller
Prompted by the Supreme Court rulings in Heller and McDonald, conservative columnist Cal Thomas and Democratic strategist Bob Beckel debate gun rights in a USA Today forum. [read post]