Search for: "SHARP v. UNITED STATES"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2016, 1:51 pm
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm
The majority held in the Dred Scott case that a slave was not a citizen of the United States and therefore did not have the requisite status to be a part of a suit in federal court. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:51 pm
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:55 am
Anyone connected to the world of law is no doubt aware of the passing away over the weekend of Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Sharpe, The Law of Habeas Corpus 5 (1990). [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
The latest decision from the NJ Appellate Division involving sex offenders, State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 10:22 am
But because the Constitution gives Congress authority to govern non-state territories, the Supreme Court’s century-old decision in Grafton v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court ruling [in Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 11:13 am
In so doing, the Fifth Circuit rejected Molina-Martinez’s contention, based on Supreme Court dicta in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:09 am
Below, relying on the High Court’s 1977 ruling in Abood v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
The petition of the day is: In re Sharp 15-646 Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am
Although mass incarceration in the United States is an important issue that most reasonable people believe policymakers must address, prison and jails haven’t historically gotten a lot of attention from digital rights advocates. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
This is the first time that any decision from outside the United States has ever appeared on our year-end best/worst lists. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am
In a number of cases out of Ohio, the perennial battleground state in presidential elections, the Sixth Circuit has found lack of uniform rules in the state to raise Bush v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 9:45 am
With all we hear about the need to respect other countries and other value systems, these harsh though widely used alternatives to prison never seem to get brought up in the discussion of the supposed moral shortcomings of the incarceration-happy United States. [read post]
