Search for: "STATE v. MCDONALD" Results 721 - 740 of 1,990
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15–16 March 2016. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
McDonald v McDonald & Ors [2016] UKSC 28 The Supreme Court has finally decided on the issue that has been hanging over private sector possession claims since Pinnock and Powell – whether article 8 proportionality of eviction defence might also apply to the private sector as well as to public body landlords. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 2:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale also stated that even if the court had been able to find the possession order disproportionate to her rights under art 8, the appellant could not assume that this would have led to the order being refused. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15-16 March 2016. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15-16 March 2016. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:15 am by SHG
This is a peculiar vision, but Marbury v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15-16 March 2016. [read post]
22 May 2016, 3:00 am by INFORRM
In July 2012 and January 2013, Dods emailed the defendant and stated that, in light of the Coroner’s findings, the allegations against him on the website ought to be withdrawn and the defendant should apologise. [read post]
16 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15-16 March 2016. [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, as the petitioners are now retireed, the School District does not have a statutory duty to bargain with them within the meaning of the Taylor Law, citing Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]