Search for: "State v. B. T." Results 721 - 740 of 18,442
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Judge Weinstein observed that when the hand waving stopped, “[t]here is no evidence that plaintiffs were exposed to the far higher concentrations involved in both animal and industrial exposure studies. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:29 am by Rose Hughes
The case did not address either of the more interesting questions of: a) whether the AI could be said to have actually invented anything, and b) how ownership of AI generated technologies should be determined. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am by Alessandro Cerri
 As the defence of acquiescence did not apply, the Defendants had infringed the Claimant's UKTM, and the Defendants' UKTMs were invalid on the ground that their use was liable to be restrained as passing off, pursuant to section 47(2)(b) TMA 1994. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:32 am by Pablo Arredondo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK  December 21, 2024 Genesis Technology v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Lisette Mustert
The Executive Director revealed that Europol acted beyond its powers by processing large datasets from several Member States which included personal data of individuals not linked to a criminal activity. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:28 am by Rose Hughes
(if selecting from convergent lists) (T 1621/16) (March 2020)Adding matter by cherry-picking from separate embodiments: Philip Morris v BAT ([2023] EWHC 2616 (Pat)) (Oct 2023)Defining what the invention is not can be as important as defining what the invention is (T 0273/22, Chimeric antibodies/REGENERON) (Nov 2023)The criteria for the novelty and inventive step of pharmaceutical selection inventions (T 1356/21) (Dec 2023)Image credit: DALLE-3 [read post]