Search for: "State v. Barry" Results 721 - 740 of 1,409
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 2:00 pm by David Bernstein
Cushman puts it this way, re Meyer v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  To be sure, Bickel was more than willing  to defend Brown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:33 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)An offensive against television streaming services was launched last week in the United States District Court for the Central District of California via a four-count, 17-page complaint, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:33 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)An offensive against television streaming services was launched last week in the United States District Court for the Central District of California via a four-count, 17-page complaint, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:51 am by Zoe Tillman
Second, they argued that prosecutors withheld potentially exculpatory evidence in violation of the precedent set in Brady v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:18 pm by Lawrence Solum
He then argues that principles of federalism would also have discouraged such a result, since they required the court to defer to the stated legislative purpose of the state that had passed the law. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:19 pm by Robert L Abell
This creates a tension and sometimes "the state applies its rules in a way that impinges upon the free interchange of ideas that is vital to self-government" as the Sixth Circuit explained recently in Berry v. [read post]