Search for: "State v. District Court of Ninth Judicial District"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2008, 9:50 am
— State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:36 am
We review a district court’sRule 12(c) dismissal for judgment on the pleadings underthe law of the regional circuit. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
These cases were consolidated into the Sixth Circuit by order of the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:02 am
However, there is no basis in U.S. law for extending the concept of "irreparable harm" to a judicial district. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm
The Supreme Court's ruling in City of Austin v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:33 pm
In 2010, in Perry v Schwarzenegger, the US District Court ruled that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional as a breach of the due process (right to marry) and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 4:18 am
The district court agreed. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:02 am
US Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit: Awad v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:29 pm
OPM, District Court docket 10-257). [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:49 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 pm
Fiore12-574Issue: (1) Whether due process permits a court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant whose sole “contact” with the forum state is his knowledge that the plaintiff has connections to that state; and (2) whether the judicial district where the plaintiff suffered injury is a district “in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred” for purposes of establishing… [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
At its Conference on January 9, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as state bans on same-sex marriage, proof of intent in a constructive discharge case, personal jurisdiction to award a no-contact order, and the presumption of judicial vindictiveness under North Carolina v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 12:33 pm
Before reaching them, the court also worked its way through a thicket of the INA’s provisions limiting judicial review, the most significant being INA § 242(e)(3), which specifies that only the District Court for the District of Columbia can review “determinations made under [Section 235(b)] of this title and its implementation. [read post]
13 May 2021, 10:08 am
The court flatly states: “a plaintiff should not be barred from proving presale, initial-interest confusion. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (which includes California) overturned that decision and sent the case back down to the District Court for further proceedings. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
The Delaware District Court’s Ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment in the case of Thomson Reuters v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 2:28 am
Crow, Circuit Judge, Sublette County, Ninth Judicial District, Pinedale, Wyoming.Citation: 2007 WY 13Docket Number: J-06-0001Order of Public CensureThe matter came before the Court upon a "Commission's Findings and Recommendations" filed December 4, 2006, by the Commission on Judicial Conduct and Ethics of the State of Wyoming. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:24 am
" APA remedies is a huge and recurring question, and it has new urgency after the Supreme Court's cert grant in United States v. [read post]
