Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 721 - 740
of 9,579
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
King v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
King v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
He attended Yale Law School, and received his doctorate in economics from MIT. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held in McCorvey v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:22 am
The court ruled that EMTALA, a federal law ensuring emergency medical care for the poor and uninsured, does not require doctors to provide abortions when doing so would violate Texas state law. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:05 am
In State of Texas v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Bixler v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:18 am
In Blackburn v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Gostin, The End of Roe v Wade and New Legal Frontiers on the Constitutional Right to Abortion, (The Journal of the American Medical Association, published online July 8, 2022).Dov Fox, What Will Happen if Doctors Defy the Law to Provide Abortions? [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 4:45 am
Whitmer stated, “I am grateful for this ruling that will protect women and ensure nurses and doctors can keep caring for their patients without fear of prosecution. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm
But Kansas law has rejected this principle as a matter of state law, see Gobin v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:53 pm
Most importantly, the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice Corp. v. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Confirms the Dismissal of a Claim of “Patient Dumping”
17 Aug 2022, 8:00 am
Kenneth Martindale v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am
Bower states: “As such, the issue is not whether the settlement was adequate or reasonable, a fair amount or not, but simply whether the client’s assent was properly obtained. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:38 pm
In addition, thanks to Roe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 8:00 am
Charles and Angie Muhammad v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:28 am
In, Mock v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
It is apparently not enough for members of CSS to observe their religion themselves; they must be allowed to punish and exclude those who reject religiously motivated homophobia in their own lives.And now, under Dobbs, states can incarcerate doctors and women for rejecting the view of a minority of Christians that a cluster of undifferentiated cells is a moral person, entitled to cause physical and emotional pain and illness to a nonconsenting woman.In his keynote, SA warned us… [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:22 am
” Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. [read post]
