Search for: "State v. Greene Circuit Court"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
The federal trial court and a three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals both agreed that the federal law (Title VII) didn’t contain a provision barring discrimination based upon sexual orientation. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:56 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the border search case U.S. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Lipez, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit --- The Nature of the Judicial Process: A Case Study5:00 - Reception -- Judaica Room6:00 DinnerVideo MessageChief Judge Janet DiFiore, New York State Court of AppealsFriday—March 249:00 - Breakfast9:30 - 10:30 -- Cardozo's JurisprudenceJoan Foley, Associate Professor of Legal Process, Touro Law Center--ModeratorJohn C.P. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm
A few hours later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declined to review en banc the court’s earlier panel decision respecting the first version of the executive order. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
First, the order expressly excludes lawful permanent residents (LPRs) who hold green cards. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 11:18 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am
I didn’t come up with that — the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, predecessor to the Federal Circuit — did, in a well-known case called Bart Schwartz Int’l Textiles, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Green Jr., Same-Sex Sex and Immutable Traits: Why Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 12:01 pm
Greene, 563 U.S. 692, 713 (2011), quoting United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
The Supreme Court warned in McCreary County v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
A. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:42 am
Epson America, Inc., Appeal No. 17-1517: responsive briefing requested by March 14, 2017 The request for responsive briefing is important since in most cases the court rejects en banc petitions without even requesting responsive briefing: At least two pending Supreme Court petitions are also based upon R.36 judgments by the Federal Circuit: Oil States Energy Services, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
Sixth Circuit: The suit should have been brought in state court. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
Many lawful permanent residents (LPRs)—that is, aliens with green cards—were denied entry to the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
https://t.co/8dpkkIEPkB -> The Supreme Court Tackles Disparaging Trademarks https://t.co/Z0Ma8wL7yi -> US court refuses to enforce an "In the box" agreement in Samsung case https://t.co/aZLvj8pZhX -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-02-08 https://t.co/AOo6tZRLjo -> Blaclock's cost Notice of Appeal https://t.co/6lewkQ2HtR quotes from my casecomment blog post https://t.co/8ELSIC2lf4, H/T @howardknopf -> Link to US 9th Circuit decision… [read post]
