Search for: "State v. J. D. B." Results 721 - 740 of 3,356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2020, 8:58 am by Robert Liles
NEW — Abusive ordering, certifying, referring, or prescribing of Part A or B services, items or drugs. 42 C.F.R. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
On 14 September, Thawley J refused that application: Australian Information Commissioner v Facebook Inc (No 2) [2020] FCA 1307. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm by Phil Dixon
The computer “had some shit on it,” and needed to be “wipe[d] down or clean[ed],” in the defendant’s words. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
Recent Judgments On 5 August 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd  [2020] EWHC 2160 (Ch) (heard 29 July 2020). [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am by Law Lady
FIRST PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a FRONTLINE INSURANCE, Appellee. 2nd District.Insurance -- Third-party beneficiaries -- Language of the policy of insurance clearly reflects that plaintiff was not intended to primarily and directly benefit from the policy where policy expressly stated that it was only between the named insured and the insurer, and that there was no contract of insurance between insurer and plaintiff. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Supreme Court stated that for a Court to assess the bona fides of a validity challenge to the arbitration agreement that only a Court can resolve requires: (a) First, the court must determine whether, assuming the facts pleaded to be true, there is a genuine challenge to arbitral jurisdiction. [read post]