Search for: "State v. Mounts"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:50 pm
The Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:23 am
The Court of Appeals reverses, and the plaintiff has no case.The case is Watson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 7:13 am
In 1985, the pivotal legal case Handschu v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:23 pm
Brian Grobois, of New York, took a trip to Washington State, and attempted a day hike in Mount Rainier National Park on December 11th, 2011. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:23 pm
Rather than plead poverty to Google or mount a generic but low-cost contract defense, myTriggers retained THREE law firms and also brought a counterclaim under Ohio’s state antitrust law, the Valentine Act. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Shaw v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Shaw v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:03 pm
Reference: People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:03 pm
"Back in the States, Mr. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 1:33 pm
Mount Laurel Township, 878 A.2d 38 (N.J. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
The AG stated that grounds for invalidity set out in the EU Trade Mark Regulation were clear and exhaustive. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
The AG stated that grounds for invalidity set out in the EU Trade Mark Regulation were clear and exhaustive. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
The AG stated that grounds for invalidity set out in the EU Trade Mark Regulation were clear and exhaustive. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
The AG stated that grounds for invalidity set out in the EU Trade Mark Regulation were clear and exhaustive. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 5:56 am
The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of appellant New Jersey in Christie v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 6:22 pm
v=pUm4A-s_a5M. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:55 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:38 pm
” citing 800 Adept, Inc. v. [read post]
