Search for: "T Diaz" Results 721 - 740 of 1,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2011, 5:27 am by Ted Frank
Jose Felix Diaz, who is behind the Florida version of Caylee's Law. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:09 am by Russ Bensing
  This analysis doesn’t survive Melendez-Diaz and Bullcoming, or even Crawford; an autopsy report isn’t prepared “for the administration of an entity’s affairs,” but for “the purpose of establishing or proving some fact at trial. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am by Aaron Pelley
The Court observed that “[t]he Confrontation Clause does not tolerate dispensing with confrontation simply because the court believes that questioning one witness about another’s testimonial statements provides a fair enough opportunity for cross-examination. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:57 am by Ted Frank
When I asked for a modification of the release to ensure that I would be quoted accurately, they suddenly didn't want to interview me any more and I never heard from them again. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
Hot Coffee also documents the story of Oliver Diaz, a former Mississippi Supreme Court Justice, to accuse the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Bockting, on retroactivity), Justice Scalia didn’t write. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:52 pm by Lisa McElroy
  In 2009, in a case called Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 pm
At trial, the prosecution introduced the results of the toxicology report showing that his blood-alcohol levels were elevated through a forensic analyst who didn't actually perform the test. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am by SHG
  And so the Melendez-Diaz line of confrontation clause decisions isn't dead yet.The four justice dissent, however, raises collateral issues that reflect the court's adoration of anything that bears the scent of science. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
New Mexico, the Court narrowly repulsed an attack on Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:07 pm by Walter Reaves
The issue before the court was whether Melendez-Diaz would apply to testimony about such reports. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:33 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The states that already followed the rule the Supreme Court announced are, in effect, the control group.Tim says (and he's the Michigan expert) that Melendez-Diaz made no difference there. [read post]