Search for: "U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board" Results 721 - 740 of 872
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Rob Tiessen, Canadian Library Association Expand fair dealing, create a good faith defence to statutory damages, circumvention for non-infringing purposes, end Crown Copyright, notice-and-notice system over notice-and-takedown. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm by Legal Aggregate
Marstiller and its implications for the personal injury compensation system. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
Western Reserve Care System, 355 F.3d 444 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 2004 U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Carrie Goldberg
What we knew is that Grindr was in an exclusive role to help stop Matthew’s hell, given law enforcement was too slow and Gutierrez had been deterred by neither arrests or orders of protection. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  July 26, 2019: An addendum to the letter agreement was prepared whereby the engagement of services would also include penetration testing of systems and endpoints. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 7:25 am by Jane Turner
The Merit Systems Protection Board has lacked a quorum for three years. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:04 pm by Emily Chan
While no system or standard is by any means perfect and many are terribly flawed, they should not be ignored by an organization’s leaders. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 2:50 am by Colby Pastre
There are currently less than two million EVs in the U.S. out of a vehicle fleet of more than 268 million vehicles, which means missed revenue from EVs is still low.[13] However, one forecast suggests EVs may comprise 17.5 percent of U.S auto sales by 2028.[14] This would be a problem for states and the federal government in the long term, but a state like California, where EVs and hybrids already make up almost 8 percent of auto sales, may be impacted sooner. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 5 conference)   Returning Relists Quality Systems, Inc. v. [read post]