Search for: "US v. Coats"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,079
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 2:38 am
Zoba International Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 9:27 am
Nearly 500 users used the system. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:02 pm
Last week, CIT Chief Judge Jane Restani issued an important decision (PDF) in the case of GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
Liberal democrat MP John Hemming used the protection of Parliamentary privilege during an adjournment debate on the Bill of Rights at Westminster Hall to claim that an individual involved in court proceedings over the risk of toxic materials leaching out of a paint used to coat drinking water tanks, was silenced by a “hyper-injunction” which even banned him from talking to an MP. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:08 pm
Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm
For example, the “Syrian regime restricts speech and online activities using Western surveillance tools, including technology from U.S. company Blue Coat. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 11:51 pm
" See, e.g., Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
Red Bull v Monster[2]demonstrated recently it is possible – however, if the later mark is not confusingly similar to the earlier mark, and the Opponent cannot prove that the Applicant intended to ride on its coat-tails, then the change in economic behaviour will depend on an actual image transfer (from RED DAWG to RED BULL, or HOUSE OF ZANA to ZARA). [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
Red Bull v Monster[2]demonstrated recently it is possible – however, if the later mark is not confusingly similar to the earlier mark, and the Opponent cannot prove that the Applicant intended to ride on its coat-tails, then the change in economic behaviour will depend on an actual image transfer (from RED DAWG to RED BULL, or HOUSE OF ZANA to ZARA). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:37 am
” Tinker v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:54 am
Coates v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
Meyncke v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
In travel ban news, on Monday the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit announced its ruling upholding most of the injunction in Hawaii v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu, a General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) decision going back to 7 July, is one of those decisions that has been sitting in this Kat's in-tray for far too long. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:06 am
(For a case involving the First Amendment and student blackface, although in a situation that did seem like mockery of blacks, see Iota Xi v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
Editions authorized for sale in the United States are of the highest quality, and are printed with strong, hard-cover bindings with glossy protective coatings. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am
My first involvement in such a case was in a case called Pearson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 6:04 am
Dist. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
”Let us go and make our visit.It all happened near the end of the week. [read blog]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
”Let us go and make our visit.It all happened near the end of the week. [read post]
