Search for: "US v. Mark Stephens"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH, ET AL., No. 11-0265 Opinion of the Court Dissenting Applying its decision today in ROBERT MASTERSON, MARK BROWN, GEORGE BUTLER... v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 8:44 am
Mark your calendars—at least for now—for September 2, 2014. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
App developers “Bang-ed” up over trade mark dispute http://t.co/J2g6RKiz28 -> Another Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Fails–Allied Interstate v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Stephen Mason, an English barrister and writer, has looked as closely at electronic signatures as anyone, and in this book he sets out his understanding of them. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Property is quite useful for developing an understanding of the structures for managing the power to control and exploit things, principally real estate in the first year. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm
The Column was marked as "Correspondence" and titled, "You're a Mean One, Mr. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Among the most innovative alternatives being developed is the cooperative, which has the potential to develop into a useful form of what this Article calls a proletarian corporation. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:20 pm
Melnick, Mark Nicas, David Ozonoff, Stephen M. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:09 pm
The methodologies approved by the First Department in the case of Rodman v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Because this book contains many (114) entries, the most important ones have been marked off in bold and asterisked. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:55 pm
Plaintiff conceded at trial that she had the use of defendant's bank account and credit cards. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Carrie Johnson of NPR obtained a 2011 letter from the Department of Justice to Senators Ron Wyden and Mark Udall, explaining how it collects information using the PATRIOT Act’s Section 215. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:45 am
This bring us to the second case, Tremblay v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:28 am
Mark Kay) in the District Court case in 2009. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 3:37 am
But this is a narrow exception to the general rule that a person will not be bound by the outcome of proceedings to which he is not a party: Skyparks v Marks, Powell v Wiltshire, Seven Arts v Content. iii) A direct commercial interest in the outcome of the litigation is insufficient to make someone a privy: Kirin-Amgen v Boehringer Mannheim. iv) Whether members of the same group of companies are privies or not depends on the facts: Special Effects. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 7:51 am
Nontextual applications—whether the mark is block capitals or stylization v. no words at all. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:43 pm
Moreover, he had been using his mark well before Red Bull had even filed its mark. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am
At this blog’s “SCOTUS for law students” feature, Stephen Wermiel discusses the issues in Agency for International Development v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:26 pm
In Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:06 am
The government argued it didn't need a warrant based on cases from the 70s based on third party doctrine - US v Miller (bank records) and Smith v. [read post]
