Search for: "United States ex rel. v. Exelis, Inc."
Results 721 - 740
of 960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Kingsley Books, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:44 pm
Circuit’s opinion in United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:50 pm
In addition, the United States has filed a lawsuit under the False Claims Act against former True Health CEO Christopher Grottenthaler and others, which is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 11:23 am
[12] United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
Sierra Club, 816 F.2d at 1384-87; Friends of Endangered Species, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:24 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 12:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 7:28 am
The settlement resolves allegations in United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 8:55 am
This decision conflicted with the Fifth Circuit’s findings in United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
United States 12-1092Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit erred when, in direc [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
United States, 393 F.3d 1277 (Fed. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:02 pm
The parallel civil case, U.S. ex rel. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
” United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
