Search for: "United States v. Minnesota"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2017, 6:01 pm
An Article I wrote in 2001 Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese – “Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules” – after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the “60 day rule” – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized dairy products in the… [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:19 am
The Role of the Courts: Stare Decisis in Constitutional Cases and Under State Law --Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
Ruth Okediji, University of Minnesota Law SchoolProf. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:08 am
Bowring v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:44 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:23 pm
Covidien counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and then filed IPRs at the United States Patent and Trademark Office challenging UFRF’s patents. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:12 am
The states of Washington and Minnesota brought a legal challenge to Executive Order 13769, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States,” which imposed a 90-day ban on the entry into the United States of aliens from seven primarily Muslim countries. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Is There a Thumb on the Scale in Refugee Convention Appellate Court Adjudication in the United States? [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
Bush in 2003, placed a temporary restraining order (TRO) on the executive order until full arguments in the case brought against the Trump administration by Washington State and Minnesota could be heard. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:21 am
See Nken v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
See, for example, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v United States, 491 U.S. 617, 623 n. 3, 109 S Ct 2646, 105 L. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:41 pm
In short, the Ninth Circuit held that the states (Washington and Minnesota) had standing and met the requirements for a preliminary injunction (styled a temporary restraining order in the district court). [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:15 pm
News:The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a unanimous ruling in the case of State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:08 pm
In Larson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm
Washington state, supported by Minnesota and Hawaii, has made several arguments demanding Robart’s order remain in place. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:59 am
It was also the subject of legal action, State of Washington v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:15 am
News:Oral argument in the case of State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
