Search for: "United States v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon" Results 721 - 740 of 797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm by Jeffrey Mitchell
Federal Courts: Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
District Court former directors and officers of New Frontier Bank. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Socially Aware reports that Following a recent U.S. district court’s ruling, foreign companies operating cloud-based services may find themselves subject to federal long-arm jurisdiction under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(k)(2), even if they have no physical presence in the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
: Fabio Perini SPA v LPC Group & Ors (PatLit) Nude trademark battle between Stella McCartney and Nude Skincare heads for Chancery Division (IPKat) NZ tribes find Everton Football Club’s misappropriation of Haka culturally insensitive (1709 Copyright Blog) Pirate Party UK officially registered (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) Save £10 on your patenting costs - Trade Marks and Trade Marks and Patents (Fees) (Amendment) Rules 2009 (IPKat) Patents County Court:… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-16 in the District of New Mexico, Magistrate Judge Lorenzo F. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm by Grace Gale
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida took this approach in A.L. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia use ad valorem taxes; only seven states assess a flat surcharge; and two states levy both an ad valorem tax and a flat-dollar surcharge. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Bruen, the Court may consider whether to elaborate on its statement in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
A court in Illinois has ruled that the US-based technology blog, TechnoBuffalo, does not qualifiy for state shield law and must disclose its source’s identity. “The decision against the consumer electronics blog TechnoBuffalo comes just one month after a federal district court in Oregon made a similar ruling regarding a Montana blogger, finding that she did not qualify as a journalist under Oregon’s reporter’s shield… [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm by Edward T. Kang
In response to appeals from the U.S. trustee, and the states of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia, the court held that the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize the plan’s nonconsensual release of third-party nondebtors, like the Sacklers, thus leaving the states’ authority to file further actions against the Sacklers intact. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces… [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled unlawful. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 3:47 am
However, in two published opinions in 2002 in the federal death penalty case of United States v. [read post]