Search for: "Van Order v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2017, 3:21 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
On appeal, the Supreme Court of Appeal upheld the judgment of the lower court and dismissed the appeal holding that the patent did not disclose any advance in radar technology and was lacked inventive step.In April, a High Court in Gauteng, South Africa discharged an Anton Piller order earlier obtained by the applicant in Hudaco Trading (Pty) Ltd v Apex Superior Quality Parts (Pty) Ltd and others. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Much of the traditional structure of IP is only explicable if you subscribe to the founding premise that the IP system is designed not to have judges calibrate b/c they’re bad at it, so we need second-order rules that say there is a thing called the work or the invention, determined in value according to market forces. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Although this resolution does not have binding effect, it indicates a trend in legal opinion within Contracting States (See P van Dijk, F van Hoof, A van Rijn and L Zwaak eds, Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights (4th Edn, Intersentia, 2006) pp.787-788). [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 12:12 pm
Haynes v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
The plaintiff required a wheelchair and appropriately equipped van for travel. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
A third interim order was made in March 2021 after a contested application by the father to have the child returned to Chilliwack (SZM v KMN, 2021 BCSC 365 (CanLII), (which was decided before Barendregt v Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (CanLII), more on the significance of this case below)). [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Tammy Berry v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 7:01 am
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
Lanigan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Van Patten, No. 07-212 Grant of habeas relief from a conviction and sentence for first-degree reckless homicide is reversed where, contrary to the ruling below, no clearly established law contrary to the state court's conclusion justified collateral relief with regard to a claim that petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel due to his participation in a plea hearing by speaker phone. . [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
United States Smartmatic, [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
The invalidation may have some serious repercussions on the ongoing Indian case ( BMS v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:17 am
Continuing the coverage of this week’s orders, The Volokh Conspiracy reports on the Court’s per curiam opinion in Porter v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:13 pm
Idaho Nov. 1, 2010); Van Dyke v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) leads a group of plaintiffs seeking to overturn Prop.22 in Castellanos v State of California (12 January 2021). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:38 am
The case was Van Hollen v. [read post]
