Search for: "Van Order v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2013, 8:23 am
Accolade, Sony v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:10 pm
One Year After The Hearing In Pliva v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:24 am
All of xHamster's servers are located outside of the United States. [read post]
9 May 2016, 9:52 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:28 pm
Therefore, the servient estate could not obstruct the natural waterway and was ordered to replace the tile. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:33 am
See State v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:58 am
Americor, Inc., a summary order decided on April 13. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
Because orders embedded in computer programs command how reality ought to be, algorithms are normative and constitute algorithmic law. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:21 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
On appeal, the Supreme Court of Appeal upheld the judgment of the lower court and dismissed the appeal holding that the patent did not disclose any advance in radar technology and was lacked inventive step.In April, a High Court in Gauteng, South Africa discharged an Anton Piller order earlier obtained by the applicant in Hudaco Trading (Pty) Ltd v Apex Superior Quality Parts (Pty) Ltd and others. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Much of the traditional structure of IP is only explicable if you subscribe to the founding premise that the IP system is designed not to have judges calibrate b/c they’re bad at it, so we need second-order rules that say there is a thing called the work or the invention, determined in value according to market forces. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 12:12 pm
Haynes v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
The plaintiff required a wheelchair and appropriately equipped van for travel. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
A third interim order was made in March 2021 after a contested application by the father to have the child returned to Chilliwack (SZM v KMN, 2021 BCSC 365 (CanLII), (which was decided before Barendregt v Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (CanLII), more on the significance of this case below)). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Although this resolution does not have binding effect, it indicates a trend in legal opinion within Contracting States (See P van Dijk, F van Hoof, A van Rijn and L Zwaak eds, Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights (4th Edn, Intersentia, 2006) pp.787-788). [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Tammy Berry v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 7:01 am
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
Lanigan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Van Patten, No. 07-212 Grant of habeas relief from a conviction and sentence for first-degree reckless homicide is reversed where, contrary to the ruling below, no clearly established law contrary to the state court's conclusion justified collateral relief with regard to a claim that petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel due to his participation in a plea hearing by speaker phone. . [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
The invalidation may have some serious repercussions on the ongoing Indian case ( BMS v. [read post]
