Search for: "W & W Holdings, LLC" Results 721 - 740 of 1,514
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Living Essentials, LLC, No. 16-1370, --- Fed.Appx. ---- (7th Cir. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In 2014, Professor De Simone decided to leave VSL Pharmaceuticals and is now collaborating with ExeGi Pharma, LLC to produce Visbiome, a probiotic using the same proprietary blend of probiotic strains that De Simone originally invented.ExeGi launched Visbiome on February 1, 2016, the day after the agreement between VSL and Danisco, the original manufacturer of VSL#3 and current manufacturer of Visbiome, expired on January 31, 2016. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
Rodriguez, 15-1204, involves a government challenge to lower court decisions holding that certain detained aliens are entitled to bond hearings. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:18 pm by Kate Howard
., a court violates the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) by presuming that allegations of waiver based upon a party’s pre-arbitration litigation conduct should be decided by the court, not the arbitrator; and (2) whether, in light of the holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:05 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, 793 F.3d 1268, 1280 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Medical Capital Holdings, Inc.; Medical Capital Corporation; Medical Provider Funding Corporation VI; Sidney M. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
The narrow interpretation of the CFAA holds that the term `without authorization’ only reaches conduct by outsiders who did not have permission to access the plaintiff's computer. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:45 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider “[w]hether § 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provides federal jurisdiction over state-law claims seeking to establish liability based on violations of the Act or its regulations or seeking to enforce duties created by the Act or its regulations. [read post]
9 May 2016, 3:14 am by Peter Mahler
., 198 AD2d 782 [4th Dept 1993], where the court affirmed an order restraining the majority shareholder from using corporate funds to pay attorney’s fees in a dissolution proceeding brought by a minority shareholder under Business Corporation Law § 1104-a, and the very recent Second Department decision in Kassab v Kassab, which I wrote about here, where the court affirmed an order holding in contempt the 75% owner of two real estate holding companies — one of them… [read post]