Search for: "WIT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. US " Results 721 - 740 of 1,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 7:49 am by Mark Zamora
Copeland & Associates, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioners. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 2:46 pm by admin
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 595 (1993). [5] General Electric Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm by Bexis
Metabolife International, Inc., 401 F.3d 1233, 1247 (11th Cir. 2005); Goebel v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
The chambers judge found that the Board erred by falling into the “trap” revealed in the Court of Appeal’s decision in Southam Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
A Canadian company, Defiant Tech Inc, accused of peddling an illicit trove of 1.5 billion user names and associated passwords has pleaded guilty to criminal charges. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Ventris Issue: Whether prosecutors may use a defendant’s statement - made in the absence of a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to counsel - to impeach a witness, as opposed to during its case-in-chief. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:00 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
According to Brian Tannebaum, a past president of the Florida Association of criminal defense lawyers, a material witness is any witness who has information about a case and, because of circumstances, securing the testimony of that witness may be impracticable. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 664 F.Supp. 2d 137 (D. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Section 25(1) “essentially provides that a police officer is justified in using force to effect a lawful arrest, provided that he or she acted on reasonable and probable grounds and used only as much force as was necessary in the circumstances” (R. v. [read post]