Search for: "Washington v. Harris" Results 721 - 740 of 1,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Harris by Tucker v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Harris by Tucker v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Under the Constitution, the Vice President, now Kamala Harris, is the designated “President of the Senate,” empowered to run all Senate proceedings—which presumably includes impeachment trials. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
”  [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Based on People v Elufe, People v Fiumefreddo and People v Harris, to effectuate a valid guilty plea the defendant must enter the plea knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm by Mark Walsh
The Supreme Court press corps is not invited to those events, but we did have our annual group outing to the Washington Nationals baseball game this past Saturday. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On 13 March 2024 there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Harrison v Cameron QB-2022-002468. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
Barnaby Feder contributed reporting from New York and Gardiner Harris from Washington. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:18 pm by CJLF Staff
  Richard Weizel of Reuters reports that last August, in the case of Santiago v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:29 am by Scott Bomboy
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:49 am by Tara Hofbauer
Mark Martins’ statements before a pre-trial motions hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]