Search for: "Young v. Head"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2011, 9:03 am
Mark must be quite a talented young fellow since his web page proclaims that he specialises in all areas of intellectual property. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:16 am
The Office -- which is likely soon to be headed by nominee Donald Verilli -- had done the same in the 7 cases that preceded Khadr v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:51 am
Arnett v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:40 am
Hodges to that of Texas v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:05 am
” Stay tuned as we head into the homestretch and conclude our Top Partners series by highlighting the best partners in some of the smaller legal markets. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm
In dorm room 4040 at West Ambler Johnston residence hall lay two bodies, a young woman still alive, but barely, suffering a bullet wound to the top and back of her head. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:16 pm
The case, Crisp v. [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 11:36 pm
Just a heads-up for young lawyers—the above is not something that you want to hear a judge say to you in court, at least if the judge is holding a document that you are responsible for. [read post]
9 Jun 2025, 1:46 pm
In June of 2013, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 4:26 am
Doe v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:14 am
Young, Jr., Stephen J. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am
Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm
That’s how the court in Higgins v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:40 pm
(Eugene Volokh) That was the order in today’s N.G. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
The majority of the Court of Appeal decided, correctly in the circumstances, that the trial judge’s stereotypical reasoning had a material effect on the acquittal of the accused (see para. 61 and the heading for that paragraph). [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 12:44 pm
”); Young v. [read post]
