Search for: "v. Holder et al" Results 721 - 740 of 921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2011, 9:39 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
" But unlike Lemley et al., who argue that § 101 independently limits claim scope, Feldman says that "this limitation could be accomplished through the disclosure requirements of section 112. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 8:04 am by The Health Law Firm
Holder, JR., et al., No. 12-5072 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am by Matthew David Brozik
., the Directors Guild of America, SAG-AFTRA, the Writers Guild of America, MGM, et al.; ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, et al.; Ralph Oman, former Register of Copyrights of the United States—all in support of the plaintiffs-appellants—and entities including the Computer & Communications Industry Association, the Internet Association, Intellectual Property and Copyright Law Professors, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, among others, all for Aereo. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 4:32 am
Those assets should then be distribited to holders of debt owed by the “old Chrysler,” the  funds argued in Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al., v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:18 pm
Motorola et al (CAFC 2010-1266) precedential The winning argument at district court was that six companies "each have the right to grant licenses to the patents in the field of Wireless Handsets. [read post]
By transferring the NFT between wallets, the NFT holders were able to remove the public listing and avoid the fee associated with its cancellation. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
[ii] For a detailed discussion on how the term ‘control’ has been defined under other statutes and regulations of India, See Sandip Bhagat et al., India: Defining Control, International Financial Law Review (IFLR), June 10, 2010. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
LEXIS 155132 :Plaintiffs [ MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL et al] assert infringement of the following claims against Snap-on: claims 1 and 8-10 of U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by assoulineberlowe
The Hydrogen Technology Corporation et al In the Southern District of New York, the SEC brought another civil action. [read post]