Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 7381 - 7400 of 16,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2023, 9:35 am by Ben Sperry & Kristian Stout
If such features rendered the website a co-developer of all users’ content, Section 230(c)(1) would be a dead letter. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:08 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
The ICC case law has not authoritatively determined the meaning of the word "case" in Article 17(1). [read post]
1 May 2017, 1:00 pm
To that end, the procedures and practices in respect of civil society involvement with regional and international organizations, including United Nations bodies, agencies, funds and programmes, and the contribution of civil society to their work and challenges and best practices must be built on the following core contextually based principles: (1) civil society space as an aspirational space; (2) civil society space as a multilateral space; and (3) civil society space admits of diversity… [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 3:03 am by Robin Shea
ROBIN – Jim and Ellen, does Judge Mazzant’s order mean that employers can relax? [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 11:49 am
Not unlike the 3/1, 5/1, 7/1 and other variations on this theme that also have been around for years. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:41 pm by John Rubin
Second, the Court of Appeals in Crump compared the felony disqualification in G.S. 14-51.4(1) to the wording of G.S. 14-51.2(c)(3). [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Every leading internet co. is in the US b/c we made a series of good decisions; wary of change. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
Co., No. 102462 Injunction prohibiting defendant railroad from blocking a certain railroad crossing for more than 10 minutes should not have been issued and the matter is remanded with direction to dissolve the injunction where the ordinance relied upon to issue the injunction violates the commerce clause, is preempted by federal railroad law, and is unenforceable. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 4:48 am by Mayela Celis
’ Main ruling Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, read in conjunction with Article 61(a) of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that a court of a Member State that is hearing a dispute relating to parental responsibility does not retain jurisdiction… [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am by John Elwood
That means that when the Court returns with new orders on May 16 (perhaps with some opinions from my man Sam?) [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:32 am by Montgomery McCracken
Christopher is a partner and chair of Montgomery McCracken’s international practice and co-chair of the products liability & risk management practice. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:58 pm by Volker 'Falk' Metzler
(cf. ksnh::law [1], [2], [3]) While ACTA requires in Art. 2 § 1 that Each Party [i.e. [read post]