Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 12,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2013, 3:35 am
(b) CONTENTS OF STUDY. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:23 am
Tarrant County attorneys who handle insurance cases need to understand the rules related to the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act.Texas Insurance Code, Section 542.056(c) says "If the insurer rejects the claim, the notice required by Subsection (a) or (b) must state the reasons for the rejection." [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 5:15 am
Dish’s gambit to purchase LightSquared is part and parcel of the company’s broader strategy to transform itself into a broadband company. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 7:29 am
§2510(17)(A)-(B). [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 8:35 am
Copeland at 858.720.7407 or Dina B. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 7:35 am
Copeland at 858.720.7407 or Dina B. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:57 am
Median amounts raised increased modestly for angel-backed Series A deals but fell for venture-backed companies, while amounts raised increased for Series B deals, but fell for Series C and later rounds. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 2:30 pm
Filed: April 16, 2013Opinion by Judge Catherine C. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Insofar as the European patent has not yet been granted (R 16(1)(b)) this third party may, no later than three months after the decision recognising its entitlement has become final (R 16(1)(a)), in respect of Contacting States designated in the EP application in which the decision has been taken or recognised or must be recognised on the basis of the Protocol on Recognition:(a) prosecute the EP application as its own application in place of the applicant (A 61(1)(a));(b) file a… [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 3:16 pm
B is clearly a PCI video card, probably a budget ATI Radeon like this: C is a PC motherboard, very difficult to identify the exact or approximate make. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:55 pm
In addition, the ICO states that it expects site operators to have appropriate internal policies in place to deal with: (a) complaints from individuals who believe that their personal data may have been processed unfairly or unlawfully because of derogatory, threatening or abusive third-party posts, (b) disputes between individuals regarding the factual accuracy of posts; and (c) complaints about how the organization processes personal data provided by users. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 3:51 am
Further, the court found those circumstances existed with respect to [the CEO] because, among other things: (a) he “was active in running [the company], including contact with individual stores, employees, vendors, and customers”; (b) he was ultimately responsible for the employees’ wages and signed their paychecks; and (c) he supervised other managerial personnel, such as the CFO and COO of [the company]. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:34 pm
A design-build firm who has identified such companies may not change the identified companies unless an identified company: (1) is no longer in business, is unable to fulfill its legal, financial, or business obligations or can no longer meet the terms of the teaming agreement with the design-build firm; (2) voluntarily removes itself from the team; (3) fails to provide a sufficient number of qualified personnel to fulfill the duties identified during the proposal… [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:37 pm
That brings us to (C). [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:37 pm
That brings us to (C). [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:58 am
If a company is spending money on advertising and claims that they are offering you something free, you can bet that what they are offering is not free and the company offering it is not in the business of providing free goods or services. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Instead, however, I believe that there are two maybe three major factors in this latest round of job cuts at Lexis in the USA A) Preparation for sale B) Further moves away from publishing and content and more emphasis on technology C) Further outsourcing plans It appears to me that Reed are ever hopeful that they can offload all of LN or parts of it and are desperate to do so. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:56 pm
This would greatly reduce (or almost eliminate) the risk of A ending up paying a much higher royalty, relative to objective patent value, than B, only because B benefits from A's agreement with C while B may be awarded a higher royalty in court. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
(c) Indemnifications. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Interruption of proceedings[2] R 142(1)(b) provides that:Proceedings before the EPO shall be interrupted … in the event of the applicant (condition A), as a result of some action taken against his property (condition C), being prevented by legal reasons (condition B) from continuing the proceedings.[3] An examination of the question of interruption based on these three conditions A, B and C was developed by the Legal Board in its decisions J 9/94… [read post]
