Search for: "Courts and Judicial System" Results 7381 - 7400 of 26,740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2013, 5:41 pm by James Ridgway
  Unfortunately, the veterans benefits system is not a typical system. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 2:00 pm
Those of us who still believe in the obligation of the courts to ensure fairness and equality for all, who share the concerns that dominated the brightly shining jurisprudence of the Warren-Brennan era, who believe that we are now in a valley in our long legal journey towards justice, may not be around to see the day when our judicial system returns to its state of glory. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:50 am
Whatever is motivating Adela Favela from returning the record, with luck she will come to understand that this matter involves not just her son but the integrity of the court's record-keeping system. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 8:00 pm by Dan Koewler
Minnesota Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 108.01, subd. 2 makes it clear that our lower courts are prohibited from doing anything to affect the current source code appeal - which includes setting cases on for trial (cases that could then be “re-appealed” and effectively double the judicial system’s workload). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 3:07 pm by Michel-Adrien
University of Windsor Law Prof Finds Self-Represented Litigants Going Through "Real Trauma" (June 6, 2012): "University of Windsor law professor Julie Macfarlane is interviewing hundreds of self-represented litigants in Ontario, Alberta and B.C. about their experiences in the family and civil court systems. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:24 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
DeKalb (2003) quoted an earlier case as saying that "the judicially-developed 'reverse doctrine of equivalents' . [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:17 am
Legal assistance helps secure a just settlement Small claims court is that branch of the judicial system with which most people have contact. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
 This view, articulated most forcefully by Henry Hart and then, with some interesting tweaks by Larry Sager, says that Congress cannot take away the power of the Supreme Court to hear those cases necessary for the Court to perform its "essential functions" within our system of government. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
” “The nature of the federal right infringed does not matter; it is the role of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system that is at stake,” Roberts concluded. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 2:38 pm by Paul Weiland
Section 104(f)(2)(A) further provides that, in the event a covered forest reserve project is subject to judicial review, a reviewing court may not issue a restraining order, preliminary injunction, or injunction pending appeal with respect to that project in response to allegations that the Secretary of Agriculture violated any procedural requirement applicable to how the project was selected, planned, or analyzed. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 1:25 pm by Guest Author
Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court issued two major decisions concerning judicial review of federal agency regulations. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The short answer is that there are flawed features of our current system that lack any clear partisan valence. [read post]
7 May 2008, 11:17 am
  I enjoyed a number of his rulings as a federal district court judge. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:28 am by Dean Freeman
Johnson & Johnson , April 17, 2015, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court More Blog Entries: $1.3 Million Injury Verdict Upheld, Save for Prejudgment Interest, March 18, 2015, Orlando Injury Lawyer Blog [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by Bill Raftery
In what was a visionary move, the Legislature consolidated all three components of the state court systems under one single administration, reducing duplication of staff and improving flexibility in the use of judicial resources. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 10:46 am by Michael Heise
Research not possible in the federal judicial space, however, is possible in the state judicial space. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 3:53 am by David DePaolo
Since CIGA did not seek judicial review after adverse decisions were returned, the court said those decisions were final and conclusive.Thus, "CIGA is barred by res judicata from relitigating its right to reimbursement," the court said.The 2nd DCA acknowledged the public policy behind the Insurance Code's limitation on CIGA's liability, but it said that this public policy could not outweigh the public policy interests in an expeditious and inexpensive system of… [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
It held that "mass torts are different," and that the interests of economy across the nation's judicial system and the need for uniformity of decisions outweighs any marginal burden on a New York state court that already is adjudicating the coordinated claims of New York plaintiffs. [read post]