Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 7381 - 7400 of 112,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2016, 1:05 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  It accomplishes this goal by providing that if the plaintiff does not accept the offer within 14 days and the ultimate judgment obtained by the plaintiff is not greater than the offer, the plaintiff must pay the statutory costs incurred by the defendant after the date the offer is made. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 11:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir.2014), that a PTAB petitioner that does not meet theArticle III case-or-controversy requirement does not havestanding to invoke judicial power, and thus does not havestanding to appeal to this court from a PTAB decision oninter partes reexamination. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:33 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
THE COURT: And I thank you and when you have the bad memories come back since you are approaching the holidays and this is going to be a burglary case, when you look over at these two tables which way does your judgment go, if you feel like you have one? [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm by essex county criminal lawyer
The change in law does not completely do away with the parole ineligibility provision of the school zone statute. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:23 am by Steven Cohen
Householder does not interpret technical terms used in the construction proposal. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 1:04 pm by highrank
A plaintiff’s lawyer in a personal injury claim does not bear a duty to prove the defendant was negligent beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 11:56 am by The Docket Navigator
That rule requires only that a party 'affirmatively state any avoidance or affirmative defense.' It does not contain the language from Rule 8(a) requiring a 'short and plain statement of the claim showing the pleader is entitled to relief[.]' Nor does it include the 'short and plain terms' language found in Rule 8(b). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:55 pm by Jon Sands
It does not need to be equal access, just ample. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:48 am by The Docket Navigator
Applying the proper standards, it is at least facially plausible that [defendant] could be liable for false marking when it marks its product as patented but the company does not own a patent that covers the product. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:53 pm by MacIsaac
The Small Claims Court does not have the ability to award Costs. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 12:04 am by admin
The post What is a pre-litigation hearing and why does my case require one? [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 12:04 pm by BCheung
Evidence of an agreement does not necessary have to be formal or informal; as long as there is an overt act or an attempt to commit the crime, the prosecutor has grounds to charge the defendant of the offense. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
State criminal rule 46 which has a catch-all “imposing any other conditions reasonably necessary to assure appearance as required, including a condition requiring the return of the person to custody after a specified time of day” does not, at least on this record, permit warrantless searches of defendant’s home or person [except maybe for urine testing which was not argued] as a condition of pretrial release because of the presumption of innocence, at least… [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:15 pm by Jon Sands
The 9th holds that an appeal waiver does not bar reconsideration of a reduced guideline range as a result of a retroactive application. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 4:49 pm
  Only then does Flatt run the conflicts check that confirms her firm represents the prospective defendant. [read post]