Search for: "John Doe D" Results 7381 - 7400 of 9,818
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Ignored five weeks of evidence, including surveys, tracking studies, Papa John’s marketing consultants, all of which indicated that it was a way to convince consumers of an important difference between the parties. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:04 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc. d/b/a PPC, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:08 pm by Mirriam Seddiq
See also John Doe Trader Number One, 889 F.2d 240, 242-44 (7th Cir. 1990) (statements made by broker on floor of futuresexchange were "expos[ed] ... to the public" and therefore not "oral communications" under federal statute); Holman v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
Christine Kehoe, D-San Diego, voted against the measure. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  None of which you'd particularly want to be in for very long.I realize that in 2015, it will be the octocentennial of that momentous day when King John kept his head by giving up a minute amount of power, but what is the 795th anniversary of a thing called? [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:09 am by Nathan
  But let’s say the case does go forward. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:19 pm
The record does not contain evidence of any analysis by defendant of the potential for high-end jury verdicts in the trial venue or any examination of jury verdict reports in cases with similar injuries in similar venues. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
"What does deter murders is catching killers and taking them off the streets. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am by INFORRM
Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill does not propose a damages cap or the power to order the publication of an apology. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 10:41 am by FDABlog HPM
  Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), John Cornyn (R-TX), and Tom Coburn (R-OK) previously criticized the legal presumption rule in S. 369. [read post]