Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 20,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Commonwealth, supra.The Court of Appeals then began its analysis of the substantive legal issues in the case, explaining that`[i]n Kentucky, the right to an impartial jury is protected by Section 11 of the Kentucky Constitution, as well as the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the [United States] Constitution. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 10:35 am
Indeed, the list of California tort law “firsts” is long and varied, including such heavyweights as Summers v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States Wired suggests that the state of Utah has become a leader in digital privacy with the passing of a new privacy law. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:04 am
Eisenhower signed into law, "In God We Trust" became the national motto of the United States of America. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:15 am
The four Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:56 am
Castro‑Huerta is an unprecedented attack on the autonomy of Native American nations in the United States. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am
" The ruling had a big impact on debates over takings law (both in the United States and around the world), and generated a massive political reaction. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
Aug. 13, 2010) The present posture of the case is that Ultramercial is again appealing from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm
Last month, Lindsey provided readers of the Drug and Device Law blog with an overview of United Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:00 am
In Easter v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
Comity did not require a Maryland court to apply Pakistani law upon the divorce of Pakistanis who were long-term United States residents when Pakistani law provided that the wife could not share in the husband's admittedly valuable pension. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
Comity did not require a Maryland court to apply Pakistani law upon the divorce of Pakistanis who were long-term United States residents when Pakistani law provided that the wife could not share in the husband's admittedly valuable pension. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:04 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:01 am
In Metcalf v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:43 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 10:58 am
In Obergefell v. [read post]
