Search for: "M J.1." Results 7401 - 7420 of 9,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2012, 11:48 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction Speech act theory will forever be associated with the great J. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:11 am
” REFERÊNCIA: art. 173, § 1º, inc. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:34 am
Experts indicate that this can actually decrease public safety, in part because law enforcement officers and others responsible for sex offender management will not be able to track offenders' whereabouts or provide effective supervision and monitoring, which is certainly not in the public interest.[1] Law enforcement agencies have long recognized that fear can be just as paralyzing to a community as the actual perpetration of a crime. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
It denied the General Counsel's motion as to Paragraphs 25-26, 30-31, 34(b), 83-84; and Appendixes G-J and CC-DD. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Cunningham, et al. as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Neither Party, In Re: Donald J. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) Conference Board of Canada ‘cut and paste’ caper; CBC recalls three reports (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (Copyfight) J D Salinger sues over unauthorised sequel to ‘Catcher in the Rye’… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) Conference Board of Canada ‘cut and paste’ caper; CBC recalls three reports (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (Copyfight) J D Salinger sues over unauthorised sequel to ‘Catcher in the Rye’… [read post]