Search for: "MATTER OF A E" Results 7401 - 7420 of 37,763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 6:01 pm by Peter Tannenwald
And the fact that the FCC directs the USF programs for which disbursements are made by the USAC doesn’t matter. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:18 am by Brian Hall
Apparently among the contents of the accessed e-mails were communications about the plaintiff's family, career, financials, health, and other personal matters. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Although I've referred to § 2255 as containing rules governing habeas petitions, that's not precisely right as a matter of terminology. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:49 am by Unknown
The ETA included language in Sections 656.17(e)(2)(ii)(D), 656.17(e)(1)(i)(B)(3), and 656.10(d)(4) applying the content requirements of Section 656.17(f) to newspaper advertisements and notice of filings, but omitted such language in Section 656.17(e)(2)(i) addressing job orders. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:49 am by leXpeak - Author
The ETA included language in Sections 656.17(e)(2)(ii)(D), 656.17(e)(1)(i)(B)(3), and 656.10(d)(4) applying the content requirements of Section 656.17(f) to newspaper advertisements and notice of filings, but omitted such language in Section 656.17(e)(2)(i) addressing job orders. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:48 pm by Kevin H. Gilmore
The court refused to find a broader subject matter waiver as a result of the introduction of this privileged document. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am by Robert B. Milligan and Daniel P. Hart
Noder, 337 P.3d 545 (Az. 2014), the Arizona Supreme Court joined this latter group and held as a matter of first impression that the AUTSA does not displace common law remedies for misappropriation of confidential information that does not qualify as a trade secret. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
[W]e believe that it is wrong in principle that the decisions of the High Court of Justiciary should be challengeable in a way which was not possible before devolution, and we are concerned about the problems this process of challenge is creating for the Scottish courts. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
The board would serve fixed, two-year terms, be responsible for all matters of policy and serve as an appeal board for certain actions of the Chancellor. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Penal Law § 260.10 (1) provides that a person endangers the welfare of a child when "[h]e knowingly acts in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child less than seventeen years old. [read post]