Search for: "MATTER OF T L S" Results 7401 - 7420 of 9,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 9:20 am by PaulKostro
Div. 1958) (stating that “[t]he property owner is only liable if, in clearing the sidewalk, he increases the natural hazard by introducing some new element of danger”). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 5:41 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
  But it doesn’t matter, because the Trial Chamber has the final say about the protection of witnesses. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:46 pm by admin
  In New York, doesn’t matter if you score 750, you can be denied   “I was denied so many times,” he said. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 5:18 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
On means plus function claims:Title 35 provides that “[t]he specification shall con- clude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm by John Culhane
Big, good, and mostly expected news: Federal district court judge Joseph L. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:36 pm
L. 103-465, 108 Stat. 4809 (1994). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:51 am by law shucks
  TPG, represented by CGSH (showing that the relationship probably isn’t on the rocks), bought out H&F and JMI’s stakes in Vertafore for $1.4 billion. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Larry Bodine
She regularly practices in the firm's bankruptcy practice group, representing creditors, debtors-in-possession and trustees in matters before the courts. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Illan Rua Wall
Rather, as a reading of (for example) Discipline and Punish makes clear, matters were all along much more nuanced than this (Foucault, pp202–203 and see Foucault, 1978, p143). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:47 pm
Title 35 provides that "[t]he specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:18 am by Franco Tarulli
Commentary 2 provides that “[t]he client is entitled to assume that the lawyer had the capacity to deal adequately with any matter undertaken on the client’s behalf. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:20 am
States continued to enjoy a wide margin of appreciation on this question.The Court’s judgment left open the question of whether the absence of any form of relationship recognition for same-sex couples might be a violation of the European Convention.Significantly, the Court’s judgment extends the scope of Article 8. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm by Steven M. Taber
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, July 1, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Sandra L. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 9:36 am by Bill Marler
But I can tell you, it's become an urgent matter, which is why we're talking about it today. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]