Search for: "People v. Long" Results 7401 - 7420 of 19,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2013, 6:49 am by David Oscar Markus
From his order (via Professor Berman's site):Last year in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 3:52 am
”Of course, when people detect bad odors, there's another famous line that comes to mind: "He who smelt it dealt it. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 8:58 am by Stephen Griffin
  Perhaps it is inherently difficult to think through the implications of changing a longstanding legal reality on which so many millions of people have relied for so long. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:53 pm
James Obergefell is a plaintiff in Obergefell, et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:24 am by Michael Risch
Consider how powerful the Samsung emails about keeping up with the iPhone were in the Apple v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
And Frankfurter has got to be bothered by the fact that Mark said in 1976 that the "time has come to blow the whistle on the Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court"-presumably because the volumes have been taking too long to get out, since Frankfurter and Freund assigned them to the wrong people. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 10:39 am by Mark Tushnet
My guess is that in discussions about whether to create a plural executive you’d find the same assumption at work, with people saying that distinctions among those people would have to be made expressly in the Constitution or adopted by the executives themselves. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:49 pm by Larry
So, let's get started.Do you remember United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:21 am by Florian Mueller
But if the trial is interrupted for a long weekend or a full week, and people spend a lot of time with their families, it's hard to imagine that there wouldn't be at least some violations of that rule. [read post]