Search for: "People v. Short" Results 7401 - 7420 of 8,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2019, 11:40 am by Phil Dixon
Vehicle search justified by search incident to arrest exception to warrant requirement U.S. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:27 am
(Ads v. real workersâ€"similar to composition of hospital staffs on TV medical shows versus in the real world.) [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
  Impose duty to monitor the markets they make; compliance of users, the quality and conduct of the people and businesses that use the platform. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:37 pm by Howard Knopf
The ALAI symposium on the Copyright Board of Canada – Which Way Ahead took place on May 25, 2016 in Ottawa. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 8:02 am by Banks Law Office
According to the record, the frozen assets fell far short of the amount needed to compensate [the alleged victims]. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Sometimes people are inclined to believe that if a document is not signed, it has no effect (and occasionally they are right.) [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
You know that, and you don't want people to get hurt while time's a wasting. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Today, people may assume that the American system never allowed such a broad conception of impeachment. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by Ken
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]