Search for: "State v. Young" Results 7401 - 7420 of 8,730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
I’ve refrained so far from commenting on the Liz Cheney — AQ7 ad, but I want to make one lengthy statement on it and, I hope, leave it at that. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:24 pm
Throwing out the convictions of Robert Simels’ associate for witness tampering among other charges, EDNY Judge Gleeson found in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by WSLL
If exclusion is never permissible, the opinion should state so unequivocally. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
In that spirit, Roberts last week denounced President Obama’s criticism of the Court in his State of the Union address, saying that the occasion had “degenerated to a political pep rally. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Dawn Harris-Young, EPA, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and hazardous materials laws for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, S.C., the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:55 pm by Mike
Pedley v Director of Public Prosecutions 2010 (QBD) (Meaning of ‘Children’s Playground’) D breached a Sexual Offences Prevention Order by observing young people playing in a skate park. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:22 am by Don Cruse
Those familiar with the Ex parte Young doctrine (case wikipedia) in federal courts will recognize the jurisdictional difference between suing the state directly and suing a state official. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:19 pm by MacIsaac
 The Court stated as follows: [25] The law to be applied in determining the duty of a driver when there are children in or about the area was set out by Hood J. in Bourne (Guardian ad litem of) v. [read post]