Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 7401 - 7420 of 51,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2017, 2:02 am by Dave
  Given that the ONS re-classification as public was put before Davis J in R(Macleod) v Peabody  and did not stop that judge problematically (imho) categorising the act there concerned (a transfer) as private, I doubt very much that the re-re-classification as private will be of any real significance. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The self-described “#1 fundraising technology used by conservatives” reported less than $2,700 in operating expenses since January 2019 despite processing over $2.8 billion in earmarked contributions, and $212 million in contribution refunds, during that period, according to the complaint. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 1:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" n122 Furthermore, the court determined that the use did not need to achieve its purpose perfectly, and that iParadigms' use of the works was transformative because it was "completely unrelated to expressive content" and was intended to discourage plagiarism. n123[and]The Sixth Circuit also reviewed the issue of transformativeness in verbatim copying. n64 In Princeton University Press v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
Given the questions certified to us by the Second Circuit, we turn to the 2007-2011 CBA's relevant provisions. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
Given the questions certified to us by the Second Circuit, we turn to the 2007-2011 CBA's relevant provisions. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
The lawyer proposes a plan to use the powers and prerogatives the law confers on the majority shareholder to squeeze out the minority. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:47 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Power Integrations, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:05 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
Although this litigation is not in the life sciences field, any judicial commentary on Arrow declarations is of interest, given their previous use by generic and biosimilar companies in seeking to clear the way prior to launch. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
  Using this framework, the paper coded "outward citations" (all precedents a given case cites) and "inward citations" (all the opinions that cite a given case). [read post]