Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 7401 - 7420
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2011, 4:02 am
Last year, in McDonald v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:08 am
Nicastro, U.S., No. 09-1343 (certiorari petition granted 9/28/10); Goodyear Luxembourg Tires SA v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:46 pm
The case of Al-Odah v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
All other funds held by the agencies and all future agency tax increment revenues would be diverted to other governmental uses. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm
I, § 8, cl. 8 (granting Congress legislative power “[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing ... to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries”). [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Today we look at a sister case, Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
However, it was not necessary, for the Directive to bite, to establish a significant effect on the conservation status of the species at population level and biogeographic level (which is what Ward LJ in the Court of Appeal had suggested). [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm
The trial court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:03 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Formisano v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:05 am
See DeBenedetto v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
Granted, Chancellor Allen enjoined the board's obstructive tactics, using dicta that broadly endorsed the shareholder choice position. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
Can it possibly be that the outcome of today’s case would be different for background checks of lower-level employees? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:58 am
Reference, Welch v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
This was the only newly granted case. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The letter at the centre of the dispute “contained a confidential statement drawn up exclusively for internal use”. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:00 pm
On December 3, 2010, Ontario arbitrators released a decision in Sheridan College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 6:07 pm
The case continues as Stern v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
Copyright exclusivity suffers from fair use and independent creation, which means that a copyright offers a very different level of exclusivity. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am
(09-1298) and Boeing Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
Justice Phang referenced the case of City Chase Stores v LVMH – the question was whether the concept of infringing acts had to be “trade mark use” in their code. [read post]
