Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 7401 - 7420 of 44,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2009, 8:01 pm
    Senator Johnson's legislation would prohibit a registered sex offender from living anywhere in New York State within 1,000 feet of a school building, park, or day care center, for at least ten years after release, and would impose criminal penalties for violations.Because Oberlander held that State law and policy pre-empted action by local units of government with regard to sex offender residency restrictions [SORR], and about 80 local SORR… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
It is therefore a "requirement that pseudonymity be limited to the 'unusual case.'" United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 6:21 pm
Just in case you want to know what the statute says: Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:37 am by John Elwood
United States, and remanded for a determination whether the error was harmless. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 2:55 am
" "In a near unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court found that immigration law does provide for deporting someone convicted of aiding and abetting a theft offense when the term of imprisonment is at least one year. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 11:01 am by Phillips & Associates
Supreme Court first recognized sexual harassment as sex discrimination in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm by Wells Bennett
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm by Robert J. McKennon
The federal courts have for a long time struggled with how to apply the deferential standard of review to actions taken by ERISA plan administrators in light of the United States Supreme Court holding in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]