Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 13,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 3:44 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256, 1268 n. 12 (11th Cir. 2009). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
Seek the help of an elder law attorney experienced in this matter. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:48 am
Baden lacks training, experience, and education dealing with psychiatric matters in cases like this one. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:10 am
Today’s (alleged) miscreant is Olufemi F. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 2:07 am
So some associations must have backed the wrong horse, as a matter of pure logic. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:45 pm
., 841 F.3d 1004, 1007 (Fed. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:53 am
A similar concept of reasonable belief by a driver i the consent of a vehicle owner applies in the extension of third party liability coverage under a driver’s certificate (Regulation s. 49(1)(c)) and under an owner’s certificate (Regulation, s. 65(1)(f))….The question is whether there is sufficient evidence from the totality of the circumstances such that, if he had considered the matter, a reasonable person in Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
It did not matter according to the District Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
Fiorito, 640 F.3d 338 (8th Cir. 2011) may have set a particularly low bar for the government to hurdle in proving mail fraud. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:10 pm
According to the dissent, the panel held the claims to the anticancer use to be invalid for double patenting because the anticancer use was mentioned (but not claimed) in the continuation-in-part specification that is not prior art, stating that “[t]he asserted claims of the later ’826 patent simply claim the anticancer use disclosed in the specification of the ’614 patent,” reported at 611 F.3d at 1389. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:21 pm
In this case, as Ling’s ’404 application was entitled under § 120 to the benefit of the ’413 application for the subject matter of claim 31, it was “an application” for purposes of § 135(b)(2) as well. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
Georgia Regional Hospital, in which “Lambda Legal … is asking the high court to rule that an existing federal law prohibits employers from discriminating against employees based on sexual orientation”; she notes that “[i]f the court takes the case, the outcome –no matter what it is– would likely have profound implications for LGBT people in employment, education, housing, and other arenas. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 2:28 am
I'm still uncertain how they are going to convict Judge Hall of a DUI when the arresting officer can't testify. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:24 am
Here are some of the latest entries: - Earnings Call Disruptions: Why Don't They Happen More Often? [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 10:32 am
Panetti fits that definition is a matter of dispute. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
KeyBank Nat'l Assn., 673 F.3d 947 (2012). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:27 am
"Coates and James F. [read post]
26 May 2022, 1:23 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:04 pm
United States, 543 F.3d 399, 408 n. 4 (7th Cir. 2008) (explaining that Teague presented no problem in a case where the defendant argued ineffective assistance of counsel for a Vienna Convention Article 36 violation because “counsel’s duty to know the applicable law, at least when it matters to his client’s defense, has been clearly established by Strickland and its progeny”). [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:57 pm
(citation omitted), and held that “[t]he Access to Justice fund is the ‘next best’ use of the remaining settlement monies in this case, because both class actions and Access to Justice programs facilitate the supply of legal services to those who cannot otherwise obtain or afford representation in legal matters,” id., at 783-84 (citation omitted). [read post]
