Search for: "State v. L. A. T." Results 7421 - 7440 of 9,948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2014, 2:52 pm
§ 2510(9) as: (a) a judge of a United States district court or a United States court of appeals; and (b) a judge of any court of general criminal jurisdiction of a State who is authorized by a statute of that State to enter orders authorizing interceptions of wire, oral, or electronic communications; That definition tells you what judges can issue wiretap orders — for example, Article III district and circuit judges but not magistrate judges —… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm by Kelly
(Taiwan) – MicroJet -ordered to show cause for failure to respond to investigation (ITC 337 Update) Red Bull – General Exclusion Order issued in energy drink investigation (ITC 337 Update) Richtek – ALJ Luckern rules on motions for summary determination in certain DC-DC Controllers (337-TA-698) (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright – Decisions A contract isn’t ‘intellectual property’ just because you’ve named it that: 4th Circuit decision in Universal… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:20 am
"  I've previously commented on the CIT decision - GPX Int’l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am by Conor McEvily
”  (H/t Howard Bashman.) [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]