Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 76,236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2015, 3:31 pm
Yovich v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 10:50 am
United States as a particularly “poorly reasoned” decision. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
Sys. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Estrada provided a detailed description of the person he had seen, stating he had no doubt defendant was that man. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm
No personal jurisdiction.Fair enough. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:14 am
In Scottish Federation of Housing Associations v Jones [2022] EAT 114, Ms Jones was Head of Membership and Policy of the Federation. [read post]
29 May 2019, 1:45 pm
Second, for no apparent reason other than posturing, on the day of the House FOSTA vote, Sheryl Sandberg made a personal post endorsing FOSTA. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 9:09 am
” The court summarizes: the Supreme Court has firmly rejected any notion that a nonresident defendant’s “doing business” in a forum state is sufficient, in and of itself, to subject the out-of-state defendant to the general personal jurisdiction of the forum state Specific jurisdiction: The plaintiff primarily relied on the Calder v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:09 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:50 pm
See Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:56 pm
The case, Briskin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:31 am
The court’s ruling is based on longstanding legal precedent, including the decision in Mansur v. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 6:37 am
ULC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:42 am
Ohio v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
See Wainwright v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:07 pm
Perhaps the most important criminal law decision issued so far this year, was that of the United States Supreme Court in Arizona v Gant, â€â [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
V’s constitutional amendment processes. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
Meanwhile, an analysis of the decision of the Court of Appeal is instructive in the context of the decision of Feeney J in Collins, especially as regards Article 23(1) of the Directive, which provides: Member States shall provide that any person who has suffered damage as a result of an unlawful processing operation or of any act incompatible with the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive is entitled to receive compensation from the controller for the damage… [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 4:20 am
The recent directive follows from the landmark judgment delivered on October 3, 2024, in the case of Sukanya Shantha v. [read post]
