Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 40,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "MPO No. 2016/1 is facially neutral and applies equally to all covered employees, regardless of age ... and no disparate impact has been shown" by Petitioners.Addressing Petitioners equal protection argument, the court said Petitioners failed to demonstrate any violation of Article 1, §11 of the New York State Constitution as "MPO No. 2016/1 treats all similarly situated employees alike. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:46 am
”As the Supreme Court held in Nelson v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 7:53 pm
As noted in [State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:12 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
In the United States, marks can manifest themselves in many different formats other than words or two-dimensional designs. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
" Erie County v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 11:09 am
But James V. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:27 am
No Supreme Court case before 2000 ever tried this maneuver to upend a decision by a state court on state law, and in Bush v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:21 am
In State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:35 am
The case is State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:01 am
In that case, Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Determining “continuous residency” for the purpose of qualifying for public office or employmentGlickman v Laffin, 2016 NY Slip Op 05842, Court of AppealsCandidates seeking election to the New York State Senate must meet the five-year New York State residency requirement and the one-year Senate District residency requirement as set out in Article III, §7 of the New York State Constitution. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
In Godoy v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 8:21 am
Last month, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:13 pm
" State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:04 am
The Secretary of State’s Planning Inspector allowed the respondent’s appeal against Swindon’s refusal of the certificate. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:40 am
"--Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOpinion Date: 4/28/2011Cite: United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:57 pm
The Sixth Circuit's recent, and short, opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:44 am
In neither instance will there be a role for Congress or state legislatures. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
While cable television companies cover the costs of the technology associated with the Assembly television signal, the setting, the operations of the Assembly, and salaries and per diems of the Assembly Members whose words and images are the substance of the Assembly television signal are all paid for by the taxpayers of the State. [read post]
