Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2015, 10:09 pm
It was so bad, he stated he did not want any more chemo if this was what he had to look forward to every time. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
In today’s case (Hendry v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 7:31 am
At casetext, James Blumstein analyzes the Court’s decision in King v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm
That hardly makes me right, but it does reflect a serious study of the Code of the Conduct for United States Judges. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
Texas, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:31 am
The FDA has stated it will continue studying how differences in the appearance between brand and generic products affect the perceptions of pharmacists and patients. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
Unlike the racially motivated beating in [Wisconsin v.] [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:05 am
Perry, Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
” Hall v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm
They studied Georgia's death penalty, did rigorous statistical analysis. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 11:33 am
Ct. 2653 (2011) and United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:11 pm
The following is a guest post by Connecticut Senior Assistant State's Attorney Harry Weller, commenting on Justice Breyer's dissenting opinion in Glossip v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
As the article clearly notes, these are preliminary studies with a number of limitations, such as the failure to control for the mental state of interviewees prior to an infestation. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:31 am
They also hark back to Baze v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:19 am
* Parten v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
Appellants alleged violations of various state consumer protection laws because, they alleged, many scientific studies have shown that glucosamine and chondroitin are no more effective than a placebo in treating the symptoms of osteoarthritis, contradicting the labels’ health claims. [read post]
