Search for: "True v True" Results 7421 - 7440 of 33,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2023, 9:52 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Koblitz —Well, it’s official: The Federal Circuit decision in GSK v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“”On a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory” (Shah v Exxis, Inc., 138 AD3d 970, 971). [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accepting these allegations as true, plaintiff adequately stated a cause of action for legal malpractice (see New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Any-Time Home Care Inc., 156 AD3d at 1046; New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Program Risk Mgt., Inc., 150 AD3d at 1593; NYAHSA Servs., Inc., Self-Ins. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accepting plaintiff’s averments and allegations as true (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; Berry v Ambulance Serv. of Fulton County, Inc., 39 AD3d 1123, 1124 [2007]) and inasmuch as the documentary evidence submitted by defendant does not conclusively refute them (see New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Program Risk Mgt., Inc., 150 AD3d 1589, 1594 [2017]), Supreme Court correctly denied that part of the motion seeking dismissal… [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, even accepting the allegations in the amended complaint as true and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the amended complaint did not allege conduct that is actionable under Judiciary Law § 487 (see Kaufman v Moritt Hock & Hamroff, LLP, 192 AD3d at 1093). [read post]