Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 7441 - 7460 of 16,708
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:35 am by Florian Mueller
But a tipping point may have been reached at which conservation will come to an end even in her district court.A few days ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's motion to stay issuance of a mandate (pending a Supreme Court petition) following a recent appellate ruling on the first California Apple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:30 pm by Vera Ranieri
  Files: Fox News v TVEyes - Order on Cross Motions for Summary JudgmentRelated Issues: Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the BalanceShare this:   ||  Join EFF [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm by Florian Mueller
Apple hasn't brought any new infringement cases against Android device makers in more than four years, and whatever little is left of Apple v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm by Steven Cohen
Facts: The core of this case (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:51 am
Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:08 am by Daniel Reisner
Forty-one of the 47 state members of the HRC nevertheless voted to accept it; the sole negative vote came from the United States, while the five abstentions came from India, Kenya, Ethiopia, Paraguay and Macedonia. [read post]